Pope Pius IX
The Syllabus of Errors (1864)
The Syllabus of Errors was
issued as an addendum to the Papal Encyclical Quanta Cura by Pope Pius IX in
1864. They functioned as a response to the increasingly powerful
forces of secularism, science, and national government that appeared to
be sweeping away Papal authority in Italy and elsewhere. The
former Papal States were already lost to Italy while Rome, still under
Papal control, was threatened. Meanwhile, public education
everywhere was intended to transfer the loyalties of faithful Catholics
to newly emerging secular states. NB: The Syllabus lists errors
that Catholics were to reject,
not truths in which they were to believe.
The following propositions have been condemned and
anathematized:
I. PANTHEISM, NATURALISM AND ABSOLUTE RATIONALISM
1. There exists no Supreme, all-wise, all-provident Divine Being,
distinct from the universe, and God is identical with the nature of
things, and is, therefore, subject to changes. In effect, God is
produced in man and in the world, and all things are God and have the
very substance of God, and God is one and the same thing with the
world, and, therefore, spirit with matter, necessity with liberty, good
with evil, justice with injustice.—Allocution "Maxima quidem," June 9,
1862.
2. All action of God upon man and the world is to be denied.—Ibid.
3. Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole
arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil; it is law to
itself, and suffices, by its natural force, to secure the welfare of
men and of nations.—Ibid.
4. All the truths of religion proceed from the innate strength of human
reason; hence reason is the ultimate standard by which man can and
ought to arrive at the knowledge of all truths of every kind.—Ibid. and
Encyclical "Qui pluribus," Nov. 9, 1846, etc.
5. Divine revelation is imperfect, and therefore subject to a continual
and indefinite progress, corresponding with the advancement of human
reason.—Ibid.
6. The faith of Christ is in opposition to human reason and divine
revelation not only is not useful, but is even hurtful to the
perfection of man.—Ibid.
7. The prophecies and miracles set forth and recorded in the Sacred
Scriptures are the fiction of poets, and the mysteries of the Christian
faith the result of philosophical investigations. In the books of the
Old and the New Testament there are contained mythical inventions, and
Jesus Christ is Himself a myth.
II. MODERATE RATIONALISM
8. As human reason is placed on a level with religion itself, so
theological must be treated in the same manner as philosophical
sciences.—Allocution "Singulari quadam," Dec. 9, 1854.
9. All the dogmas of the Christian religion are indiscriminately the
object of natural science or philosophy, and human reason, enlightened
solely in an historical way, is able, by its own natural strength and
principles, to attain to the true science of even the most abstruse
dogmas; provided only that such dogmas be proposed to reason itself as
its object.—Letters to the Archbishop
of Munich,
"Gravissimas inter," Dec. 11, 1862, and "Tuas libenter," Dec. 21, 1863.
10. As the philosopher is one thing, and philosophy another, so it is
the right and duty of the philosopher to subject himself to the
authority which he shall have proved to be true; but philosophy neither
can nor ought to submit to any such authority.—Ibid., Dec. 11, 1862.
11. The Church not only ought never to pass judgment on philosophy, but
ought to tolerate the errors of philosophy, leaving it to correct
itself.—Ibid., Dec. 21, 1863.
12. The decrees of the Apostolic See and of the Roman congregations
impede the true progress of science.—Ibid.
13. The method and principles by which the old scholastic doctors
cultivated theology are no longer suitable to the demands of our times
and to the progress of the sciences.—Ibid.
14. Philosophy is to be treated without taking any account of
supernatural revelation.—Ibid.
III. INDIFFERENTISM, LATITUDINARIANISM
15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which,
guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.—Allocution
"Maxima quidem," June 9, 1862; Damnatio "Multiplices inter," June 10,
1851.
16. Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way
of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.—Encyclical "Qui
pluribus," Nov. 9, 1846.
17. Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of
all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ.—Encyclical
"Quanto conficiamur," Aug. 10, 1863, etc.
18. Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true
Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as
in the Catholic Church.—Encyclical "Noscitis," Dec. 8, 1849.
IV. SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, SECRET SOCIETIES, BIBLICAL SOCIETIES,
CLERICO-LIBERAL SOCIETIES
Pests of this kind are frequently reprobated in the severest terms in
the Encyclical "Qui pluribus," Nov. 9, 1846, Allocution "Quibus
quantisque," April 20, 1849, Encyclical "Noscitis et nobiscum," Dec. 8,
1849, Allocution "Singulari quadam," Dec. 9, 1854, Encyclical "Quanto
conficiamur," Aug. 10, 1863.
V. ERRORS CONCERNING THE CHURCH AND HER RIGHTS
19. The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free- nor is
she endowed with proper and perpetual rights of her own, conferred upon
her by her Divine Founder; but it appertains to the civil power to
define what are the rights of the Church, and the limits within which
she may exercise those rights.—Allocution "Singulari quadam," Dec. 9,
1854, etc.
20. The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority
without the permission and assent of the civil government.—Allocution
"Meminit unusquisque," Sept. 30, 1861.
21. The Church has not the power of defining dogmatically that the
religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion.—Damnatio
"Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851.
22. The obligation by which Catholic teachers and authors are strictly
bound is confined to those things only which are proposed to universal
belief as dogmas of faith by the infallible judgment of the
Church.—Letter to the Archbishop
of Munich,
"Tuas libenter," Dec. 21, 1863.
23. Roman pontiffs and ecumenical councils have wandered outside the
limits of their powers, have usurped the rights of princes, and have
even erred in defining matters of faith and morals.—Damnatio
"Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851.
24. The Church has not the power of using force, nor has she any
temporal power, direct or indirect.—Apostolic Letter "Ad Apostolicae,"
Aug. 22, 1851.
25. Besides the power inherent in the episcopate, other temporal power
has been attributed to it by the civil authority granted either
explicitly or tacitly, which on that account is revocable by the civil
authority whenever it thinks fit.—Ibid.
26. The Church has no innate and legitimate right of acquiring and
possessing property.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec. 15, 1856;
Encyclical "Incredibili," Sept. 7, 1863.
27. The sacred ministers of the Church and the Roman pontiff are to be
absolutely excluded from every charge and dominion over temporal
affairs.—Allocution "Maxima quidem," June 9, 1862.
28. It is not lawful for bishops to publish even letters Apostolic
without the permission of Government.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec.
15, 1856.
29. Favours granted by the Roman pontiff ought to be considered null,
unless they have been sought for through the civil government.—Ibid.
30. The immunity of the Church and of ecclesiastical persons derived
its origin from civil law.—Damnatio "Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851.
31. The ecclesiastical forum or tribunal for the temporal causes,
whether civil or criminal, of clerics, ought by all means to be
abolished, even without consulting and against the protest of the Holy
See.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec. 15, 1856; Allocution
"Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852.
32. The personal immunity by which clerics are exonerated from military
conscription and service in the army may be abolished without violation
either of natural right or equity. Its abolition is called for by civil
progress, especially in a society framed on the model of a liberal
government.—Letter to the Bishop of Monreale "Singularis nobisque,"
Sept. 29, 1864.
33. It does not appertain exclusively to the power of ecclesiastical
jurisdiction by right, proper and innate, to direct the teaching of
theological questions.—Letter to the Archbishop
of Munich,
"Tuas libenter," Dec. 21, 1863.
34. The teaching of those who compare the Sovereign Pontiff to a
prince, free and acting in the universal Church, is a doctrine which
prevailed in the Middle Ages.—Apostolic Letter "Ad Apostolicae," Aug.
22, 1851.
35. There is nothing to prevent the decree of a general council, or the
act of all peoples, from transferring the supreme pontificate from the
bishop and city of Rome to another bishop and another city.—Ibid.
36. The definition of a national council does not admit of any
subsequent discussion, and the civil authority car assume this
principle as the basis of its acts.—Ibid.
37. National churches, withdrawn from the authority of the Roman
pontiff and altogether separated, can be established.—Allocution
"Multis gravibusque," Dec. 17, 1860.
38. The Roman pontiffs have, by their too arbitrary conduct,
contributed to the division of the Church into Eastern and
Western.—Apostolic Letter "Ad Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851.
VI. ERRORS ABOUT CIVIL SOCIETY, CONSIDERED BOTH IN ITSELF AND IN
ITS RELATION TO THE CHURCH
39. The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed
with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.—Allocution
"Maxima quidem," June 9, 1862.
40. The teaching of the Catholic Church is hostile to the well- being
and interests of society.—Encyclical "Qui pluribus," Nov. 9, 1846;
Allocution "Quibus quantisque," April 20, 1849.
41. The civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel
sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious
affairs. It therefore possesses not only the right called that of
"exsequatur," but also that of appeal, called "appellatio ab
abusu."—Apostolic Letter "Ad Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851
42. In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the
civil law prevails.—Ibid.
43. The secular Dower has authority to rescind, declare and render
null, solemn conventions, commonly called concordats, entered into with
the Apostolic See, regarding the use of rights appertaining to
ecclesiastical immunity, without the consent of the Apostolic See, and
even in spite of its protest.—Allocution "Multis gravibusque," Dec. 17,
1860; Allocution "In consistoriali," Nov. 1, 1850.
44. The civil authority may interfere in matters relating to religion,
morality and spiritual government: hence, it can pass judgment on the
instructions issued for the guidance of consciences, conformably with
their mission, by the pastors of the Church. Further, it has the right
to make enactments regarding the administration of the divine
sacraments, and the dispositions necessary for receiving
them.—Allocutions "In consistoriali," Nov. 1, 1850, and "Maxima
quidem," June 9, 1862.
45. The entire government of public schools in which the youth- of a
Christian state is educated, except (to a certain extent) in the case
of episcopal seminaries, may and ought to appertain to the civil power,
and belong to it so far that no other authority whatsoever shall be
recognized as having any right to interfere in the discipline of the
schools, the arrangement of the studies, the conferring of degrees, in
the choice or approval of the teachers.—Allocutions "Quibus
luctuosissimis," Sept. 5, 1851, and "In consistoriali," Nov. 1, 1850.
46. Moreover, even in ecclesiastical seminaries, the method of studies
to be adopted is subject to the civil authority.—Allocution "Nunquam
fore," Dec. 15, 1856.
47. The best theory of civil society requires that popular schools open
to children of every class of the people, and, generally, all public
institutes intended for instruction in letters and philosophical
sciences and for carrying on the education of youth, should be freed
from all ecclesiastical authority, control and interference, and should
be fully subjected to the civil and political power at the pleasure of
the rulers, and according to the standard of the prevalent opinions of
the age.—Epistle to the Archbishop
of Freiburg, "Cum non sine," July 14, 1864.
48. Catholics may approve of the system of educating youth unconnected
with Catholic faith and the power of the Church, and which regards the
knowledge of merely natural things, and only, or at least primarily,
the ends of earthly social life.—Ibid.
49. The civil power may prevent the prelates of the Church and the
faithful from communicating freely and mutually with the Roman
pontiff.—Allocution "Maxima quidem," June 9, 1862.
50. Lay authority possesses of itself the right of presenting bishops,
and may require of them to undertake the administration of the diocese
before they receive canonical institution, and the Letters Apostolic
from the Holy See.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec. 15, 1856.
51. And, further, the lay government has the right of deposing bishops
from their pastoral functions, and is not bound to obey the Roman
pontiff in those things which relate to the institution of bishoprics
and the appointment of bishops.—Allocution "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27,
1852, Damnatio "Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851.
52. Government can, by its own right, alter the age prescribed by the
Church for the religious profession of women and men; and may require
of all religious orders to admit no person to take solemn vows without
its permission.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec. 15, 1856.
53. The laws enacted for the protection of religious orders and
regarding their rights and duties ought to be abolished; nay, more,
civil Government may lend its assistance to all who desire to renounce
the obligation which they have undertaken of a religious life, and to
break their vows. Government may also suppress the said religious
orders, as likewise collegiate churches and simple benefices, even
those of advowson and subject their property and revenues to the
administration and pleasure of the civil power.—Allocutions
"Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852; "Probe memineritis," Jan. 22, 1855;
"Cum saepe," July 26, 1855.
54. Kings and princes are not only exempt from the jurisdiction of the
Church, but are superior to the Church in deciding questions of
jurisdiction.—Damnatio "Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851.
55. The Church ought to be separated from the .State, and the State
from the Church.—Allocution "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852.
VII. ERRORS CONCERNING NATURAL AND CHRISTIAN ETHICS
56. Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction, and it is
not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the
laws of nature and receive their power of binding from God.—Allocution
"Maxima quidem," June 9, 1862.
57. The science of philosophical things and morals and also civil laws
may and ought to keep aloof from divine and ecclesiastical
authority.—Ibid.
58. No other forces are to be recognized except those which reside in
matter, and all the rectitude and excellence of morality ought to be
placed in the accumulation and increase of riches by every possible
means, and the gratification of pleasure.—Ibid.; Encyclical "Quanto
conficiamur," Aug. 10, 1863.
59. Right consists in the material fact. All human duties are an empty
word, and all human facts have the force of right.—Allocution "Maxima
quidem," June 9, 1862.
60. Authority is nothing else but numbers and the sum total of material
forces.—Ibid.
61. The injustice of an act when successful inflicts no injury on the
sanctity of right.—Allocution "Jamdudum cernimus," March 18, 1861.
62. The principle of non-intervention, as it is called, ought to be
proclaimed and observed.—Allocution "Novos et ante," Sept. 28, 1860.
63. It is lawful to refuse obedience to legitimate princes, and even to
rebel against them.—Encyclical "Qui pluribus," Nov. 9, 1864; Allocution
"Quibusque vestrum," Oct. 4, 1847; "Noscitis et Nobiscum," Dec. 8,
1849; Apostolic Letter "Cum Catholica."
64. The violation of any solemn oath, as well as any wicked and
flagitious action repugnant to the eternal law, is not only not
blamable but is altogether lawful and worthy of the highest praise when
done through love of country.—Allocution "Quibus quantisque," April 20,
1849.
VIII. ERRORS CONCERNING CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE
65. The doctrine that Christ has raised marriage to the dignity of a
sacrament cannot be at all tolerated.—Apostolic Letter "Ad
Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851.
66. The Sacrament of Marriage is only a something accessory to the
contract and separate from it, and the sacrament itself consists in the
nuptial benediction alone.—Ibid.
67. By the law of nature, the marriage tie is not indissoluble, and in
many cases divorce properly so called may be decreed by the civil
authority.—Ibid.; Allocution "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852.
68. The Church has not the power of establishing diriment impediments
of marriage, but such a power belongs to the civil authority by which
existing impediments are to be removed.—Damnatio "Multiplices inter,"
June 10, 1851.
69. In the dark ages the Church began to establish diriment
impediments, not by her own right, but by using a power borrowed from
the State.—Apostolic Letter "Ad Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851.
70. The canons of the Council of Trent, which anathematize those who
dare to deny to the Church the right of establishing diriment
impediments, either are not dogmatic or must be understood as referring
to such borrowed power.—Ibid.
71. The form of solemnizing marriage prescribed by the Council of
Trent, under pain of nullity, does not bind in cases where the civil
law lays down another form, and declares that when this new form is
used the marriage shall be valid.
72. Boniface VIII was the first who declared that the vow of chastity
taken at ordination renders marriage void.—Ibid.
73. In force of a merely civil contract there may exist between
Christians a real marriage, and it is false to say either that the
marriage contract between Christians is always a sacrament, or that
there is no contract if the sacrament be excluded.—Ibid.; Letter to the
King of Sardinia,
Sept. 9, 1852; Allocutions "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852, "Multis
gravibusque," Dec. 17, 1860.
74. Matrimonial causes and espousals belong by their nature to civil
tribunals.—Encyclical "Qui pluribus," Nov. 9 1846; Damnatio
"Multiplices inter," June 10, 1851, "Ad Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851;
Allocution "Acerbissimum," Sept. 27, 1852.
IX. ERRORS REGARDING THE CIVIL POWER OF THE SOVEREIGN PONTIFF
75. The children of the Christian and Catholic Church are divided
amongst themselves about the compatibility of the temporal with the
spiritual power.—"Ad Apostolicae," Aug. 22, 1851.
76. The abolition of the temporal power of which the Apostolic See is
possessed would contribute in the greatest degree to the liberty and
prosperity of the Church.—Allocutions "Quibus quantisque," April 20,
1849, "Si semper antea," May 20, 1850.
X. ERRORS HAVING REFERENCE TO MODERN LIBERALISM
77. In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic
religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the
exclusion of all other forms of worship.—Allocution "Nemo vestrum,"
July 26, 1855.
78. Hence it has been wisely decided by law, in some Catholic
countries, that persons coming to reside therein shall enjoy the public
exercise of their own peculiar worship.—Allocution "Acerbissimum,"
Sept. 27, 1852.
79. Moreover, it is false that the civil liberty of every form of
worship, and the full power, given to all, of overtly and publicly
manifesting any opinions whatsoever and thoughts, conduce more easily
to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the
pest of indifferentism.—Allocution "Nunquam fore," Dec. 15, 1856.
80. The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to
terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.—Allocution
"Jamdudum cernimus," March 18, 1861.
The faith teaches us and human reason demonstrates that a double order
of things exists, and that we must therefore distinguish between the
two earthly powers, the one of natural origin which provides for
secular affairs and the tranquillity of human society, the other of
supernatural origin, which presides over the City of God, that is to
say the Church of Christ, which has been divinely instituted for the
sake of souls and of eternal salvation.... The duties of this twofold
power are most wisely ordered in such a way that to God is given what
is God's (Matt. 22:21), and because of God to Caesar what is Caesar's,
who is great because he is smaller than heaven. Certainly the Church
has never disobeyed this divine command, the Church which always and
everywhere instructs the faithful to show the respect which they should
inviolably have for the supreme authority and its secular rights....
.... Venerable Brethren, you see clearly enough how sad and full of
perils is the condition of Catholics in the regions of Europe which We
have mentioned. Nor are things any better or circumstances calmer in
America, where some regions are so hostile to Catholics that their
governments seem to deny by their actions the Catholic faith they claim
to profess. In fact, there, for the last few years, a ferocious war on
the Church, its institutions and the rights of the Apostolic See has
been raging.... Venerable Brothers, it is surprising that in our time
such a great war is being waged against the Catholic Church. But anyone
who knows the nature, desires and intentions of the sects, whether they
be called masonic or bear another name, and compares them with the
nature the systems and the vastness of the obstacles by which the
Church has been assailed almost everywhere, cannot doubt that the
present misfortune must mainly be imputed to the frauds and
machinations of these sects. It is from them that the synagogue of
Satan, which gathers its troops against the Church of Christ, takes its
strength. In the past Our predecessors, vigilant even from the
beginning in Israel, had already denounced them to the kings and the
nations, and had condemned them time and time again, and even We have
not failed in this duty. If those who would have been able to avert
such a deadly scourge had only had more faith in the supreme Pastors of
the Church! But this scourge, winding through sinuous caverns, . . .
deceiving many with astute frauds, finally has arrived at the point
where it comes forth impetuously from its hiding places and triumphs as
a powerful master. Since the throng of its propagandists has grown
enormously, these wicked groups think that they have already become
masters of the world and that they have almost reached their
pre-established goal. Having sometimes obtained what they desired, and
that is power, in several countries, they boldly turn the help of
powers and authorities which they have secured to trying to submit the
Church of God to the most cruel servitude, to undermine the foundations
on which it rests, to contaminate its splendid qualities; and,
moreover, to strike it with frequent blows, to shake it, to overthrow
it, and, if possible, to make it disappear completely from the earth.
Things being thus, Venerable Brothers, make every effort to defend the
faithful which are entrusted to you against the insidious contagion of
these sects and to save from perdition those who unfortunately have
inscribed themselves in such sects. Make known and attack those who,
whether suffering from, or planning, deception, are not afraid to
affirm that these shady congregations aim only at the profit of
society, at progress and mutual benefit. Explain to them often and
impress deeply on their souls the Papal constitutions on this subject
and teach, them that the masonic associations are anathematized by them
not only in Europe but also in America and wherever they may be in the
whole world.
To the Archbishops and Bishops of Prussia concerning the
situation of the Catholic Church faced with persecution by that
Government....
But although they (the bishops resisting persecution) should be praised
rather than pitied, the scorn of episcopal dignity, the violation of
the liberty and the rights of the Church, the ill treatment which does
not only oppress those dioceses, but also the others of the Kingdom of
Prussia, demand that We, owing to the Apostolic office with which God
has entrusted us in spite of Our insufficient merit, protest against
laws which have produced such great evils and make one fear even
greater ones; and as far as we are able to do so with the sacred
authority of divine law, We vindicate for the Church the freedom which
has been trodden underfoot with sacrilegious violence. That is why by
this letter we intend to do Our duty by announcing openly to all those
whom this matter concerns and to the whole Catholic world, that these
laws are null and void because they are absolutely contrary to the
divine constitution of the Church. In fact, with respect to matters
which concern the holy ministry, Our Lord did not put the mighty of
this century in charge, but Saint Peter, whom he entrusted not only
with feeding his sheep, but also the goats; therefore no power in the
world, however great it may be, can deprive of the pastoral office
those whom the Holy Ghost has made Bishops in order to feed the Church
of God.