Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education

 


·What are the Seven Principles?

 

 

·References

***Faculty Development*****Faculty Development*****Media Development******Software Evaluation******Ed Tech Grants***

Grayson H. Walker Teaching Resource Center
The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
401 Hunter Hall--Mail Code 4354
615 McCallie Ave.
Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
(423) 425-4188
(423) 425-4025 (fax)

Send ideas for new workshops or comments to: Karen I. Adsit, EdD, Director

 

Last modified October 8, 2002

[HOMEPAGE]
 

 

Copyright © 1998 the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. All rights reserved.

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga is an EEO/AA/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA institution.

[TOP OF PAGE]

 

 



What are the Seven Principles?

How can undergraduate education be improved?  In 1987, Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda f. Gamson answered this question when they wrote "Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education".  They defined what good education means at the undergraduate level.  The seven principles are based upon research on good teaching and learning in the college setting.

 

These principles have been intended as a guideline for faculty members, students, and administrators to follow to improve teaching and learning.  Research for over 50 years on practical experience of students and teachers supports these principles.  When all principles are practiced, there are six other forces in education that surface:  activity, expectations, cooperation, interaction, diversity, and responsibility.  Good practices work for professional programs as well as the liberal arts.  They also work for a variety of students:  Hispanic, Asian, young, old, rich, poor.

Teachers and students have the most responsibility for improving undergraduate education.  However, improvements will need to be made by college and university leaders, and state and federal officials.  It is a joint venture among all that is possible.  When this does occur, faculty and administrators think of themselves as educators that have a a shared goal.  Resources become available for students, faculty, and administrators to work together.

The goal of the seven principles is to prepare the student to deal with the real world.
**Top of Page**

 


Principle 1:  Encourage contact between students and faculty.

Building rapport with students is very important.  The contact between students and teachers are vital to the students' success.  One of the main reasons students leave school is the feeling of isolation that they experience.  The concern shown will help students get through difficult times and keep working.  Faculty have many avenues to follow to open up the lines of communication.

 

For the regular classroom:

 

For distance education courses:

 

 

Principle in action:

 

 

Technology, like e-mail, computer conferencing, and the World Wide Web,  now gives more opportunities for students and faculty to converse.  It is efficient, convenient, and protected.  It allows more privacy so that students are able to discuss more openly without fear that other students are going to hear.  E-mail also gives student more time to think about what they want to say.  With these new alternatives to face-to-face communication, interaction from more students should increase within the classroom.
 
Resources:
 
Building awareness and diversity into student life: Pomona College. (1991). Liberal Education, 77 (1), 38-40.
 
First year experience creates a community of learners: Augsburg College. (1989). Liberal Education, 75 (5), 28-29.
 
Furlong, D. (1994). Using electronic mail to improve instruction. The Teaching Professor, 8 (6), 7.
O'Neill, K.L. and Todd-Mancillas, W.R. (1992). An investigation into the types of turning points affecting relational change in
        student-faculty interactions. Innovative Higher Education, 16, (4), 227-290.
Wilson, R.C., Gaff, J.G., Dienst, L.W., and Bavry, J.L. (1975). College Professors and Their Impact on Students.
        New York, NY: John Wiley.
 

Principle 2:  Develop reciprocity and cooperation among students.

When students are encouraged to work as a team, more learning takes place.  Characteristics of good learning are collaborative and social, not competitive and isolated.  Working together improves thinking and understanding.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses:

 

Principle in action:

 

 

Cooperative learning has several benefits.  Students care more about their learning because of the interdependent nature of the process.  Retention is higher because there is a social and intellectual aspect on the content material.  Students also find the method more enjoyable because there is no competition placed upon them.  Cooperation, not competition, is more effective in promoting student learning.

Resources:

 

Cassini, C. (1994). Collaborative testing, grading. The Teaching Professor, 8 (4), 5.

Grading student projects: A project in itself. (1994). Adapted from For Your Consideration, 3 (3), by The Teaching
        Professor, 8 (2), 3-4.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1985). Cooperative Learning: Warm Ups, Grouping Strategies and Group Activities.
        Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.

McKinney, K. and Graham-Buxton, M. (1993). The use of collaborative learning groups in the large class: Is it possible?
        Teaching Sociology, 21, 403-408.

Prescott, S. (1992). Cooperation and motivation. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 3 (1).

*Special note: The National Center on Post secondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment has developed a source book on collaborative learning.  Contact: NCTLA, Penn State University, 403 S. Allen St. Suite 104, University Park, PA 16801.


Principle 3:  Encourage active learning.

Learning is an active process.  Students are not able to learn much by only sitting in classes listening to teachers, memorizing pre-packaged assignments, and churning out answers.  They must be able to talk about what they are learning, write about it, relate it to past experiences, and apply it to their daily lives.  Students need to make learning a part of themselves.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses: Principle in action: Promoting active learning in higher education is a struggle because of the learning background that many students come to classes with.  This is due to the fact that the norm in our nation's secondary schools has been to promote passive learning.  A large amount of  information needs to be covered with not enough time,  so teachers resort to lecture in order to economize their time to cover as much material as possible.  Students progress from topic to topic with no real understanding of the content and how it relates to their life.  Effective learning is active learning.  The concept of active learning has been applied to curriculum design, internship programs, community service, laboratory science instruction, musical and speech performance, seminar classes, undergraduate research, peer teaching, and computer-assisted learning.  The common thread between all these events is to stimulate students to think about how they as well as what they are learning and to take more responsibility for their own education.

Resources:

 

Gabennesch, H. (1992). Creating quality class discussion. The Teaching Professor, 6 (9), 5.

Hands on experience in course's focus: Temple University. (1989). Liberal Education, 75 (4), 33-34.

Harrison-Pepper, S. (1991). Dramas of persuasion: Utilizing performance in the classroom. Journal of Excellence in College
        Teaching, 2.

Interdisciplinary approach to technology. (1998). Liberal Education, 74, (2), 23-24.

Nalcolmson, P. and Myers, R. (1993). Debates: Techniques for improving student thinking. The Teaching Professor, 7 (3) 6.

 


Principle 4:  Give prompt feedback.

By knowing what you know and do not know gives a focus to learning.  In order for students to benefit from courses, they need appropriate feedback on their performance.  When starting out, students need help in evaluating their current knowledge and capabilities.  Within the classroom, students need frequent opportunities to perform and receive suggestions for improvement.  Throughout their time in college and especially at the end of their college career, students need chances to reflect on what they have learned, what they still need to know, and how to assess themselves.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses:

 

Principle in action: The importance of feedback is so obvious that it is often taken for granted during the teaching and learning process.  It is a simple yet powerful tool to aid in the learning process.  Feedback is any means to inform a learner of their accomplishments and areas needing improvement.  There are several different forms that feedback can take.  They are oral, written, computer displayed, and from any of the interactions that occur in group learning.  What is important is that the learner is informed and can associate the feedback with a specific response.
Resources:
Brinko, K.T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 64 (5), 574-593.
Dohrer, G. (1991). Do teachers comments on students' papers help? College Teaching, 39 (2), 48-54.
Enhancing instructor-class communication. (1994). The Teaching Professor, 8 (3), 3-4.
More on student self-assessment. (1992). The Teaching Professor, 6 (10), 7.
Svinicki, M.D. Four R's of effective evaluation. (1993). Reprinted from The Center for Teaching Effectiveness Newsletter at
        the University of Texas as Austin, in The Teaching Professor, 7 (9), 3-4.
 

Principle 5:  Emphasize time on task.

Learning needs time and energy.  Efficient time-management skills are critical for students.  By allowing realistic amounts of time, effective learning for students and effective teaching for faculty are able to occur.  The way the institution defines time expectations for students, faculty, administrators, and other staff, can create the basis for high performance from everyone.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses:

 

Principle in action:

 

 

An easy assumption to make would be that students would be more successful if they spent more time studying.  It makes sense but it over simplifies the principle of time on task.  Student achievement is not simply a matter of the amount of time spent working on a task.  Even though learning and development require time, it is an error to disregard how much time is available and how well the time is spent.  Time on task is more complicated than one might assume.

Resources:
 

Britton, B.K., and Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational
        Psychology, 83 (3), 405-410.
Earth-sea-sky course combines art, science: Mississippi State University. (1988). Liberal Education, 74 (2), 29-30.
Geiger, K. (1994). Rethinking school time: New, Better, and different...as well as more.  The Washington Post, June 12,
        1994. p. C3.
Ludewig, L.M. (1992). The ten commandments for effective study skills. The Teaching Professor, 5 (10), 3.
Terenzini, P.T., and Pascarella, E.T. (1994). Living with myths: Undergraduate education in America. Change, pp. 28-32.

 

Principle 6:  Communicate high expectations.

Expect more and you will get it.  The poorly prepared, those unwilling to exert themselves, and the bright and motivated all need high expectations.  Expecting students to perform well becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy when teachers and institutions hold high standards and make extra efforts.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses:

 

Principle in action:

 

 

Although it is often only discussed at the instructional level, high expectations also includes the students' performance and behavior inside and outside the classroom.  College and universities expect students to meet their high expectations for performance in the classroom, but also expect a personal and professional commitment to values and ethics.  They include the discipline to set goals and stick with them, an awareness and appreciation of the diversity of society, and a philosophy of service to others.

Resources:
 

An American Imperative: Higher Expectations for Higher Education. An open letter to those concerned about the
        American future. Report on the Wingspread group in Higher education. (1993).
Defining what students need to know: Clayton State. (1988). Liberal Education, 74 (3), 29-30.
Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L. (1990). Learning communities: Creative connections among
        students, faculty, and disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (4), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nuhfer, E.B. (1993). Bottom line disclosure and assessment. The Teaching Professor, 7 (7), 8.
 
Williams, J.H. (1993). Clarifying grade expectations. The Teaching Professor, 7 (7), 1.

Principle 7:  Respect diverse talents and ways of learning.

There are many different ways to learn and no two people learn the same way.  Students bring different talents and learning styles to the classroom.  Students that excel in the seminar room may be all thumbs in the lab or art studio and vice versa.  Students need the opportunity to show their talents and learn in ways that work for them.  Then, they can be guided into new ways of learning that are not as easy for them.

 

For the regular classroom:

For distance education courses: Principle in Action: The meaning of diversity is very clear from effective institutions.  They embrace diversity and systematically foster it.  This respect for diversity should play a central part in university decisions, be apparent in the services and resources available to students and resources available to students, be a feature of every academic program, and practiced in every classroom.

Resources:

 

Hill, P.J. (1991). Multiculturalism: The crucial philosophical and organizational issues. Change, 38-47.

Jacobs, L.C., and Chase, C.I. (1992). Developing and Using Tests Effectively: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, CA:
        Jossey-Bass.

Kolb, D. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In The Modern American College, edited by A.W. Chickering
        and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lynch, J.M., and Bishop-Clark, C. (1993). Traditional and nontraditional student attitudes toward the mixed age classroom.
        Innovative Higher Education. Winter, 109-121.

National Institute of Education. (1984). Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education.
        Final report of the study group on the conditions of excellence in American higher education. Washington, DC: U.S.
        Department of Education News.

 


References **Top of Page**

***Faculty Development*****Faculty Development*****Media Development******Software Evaluation******Ed Tech Grants***

Grayson H. Walker Teaching Resource Center
The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
401 Hunter Hall--Mail Code 4354
615 McCallie Ave.
Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
(423) 425-4026
(423) 425-4025 (fax)

Send comments to: Karen I. Adsit, EdD, Director

 

Last modified October 8, 2002.

[HOMEPAGE]
 

 

Copyright © 1998 the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. All rights reserved.

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga is an EEO/AA/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA institution.
 
[TOP OF PAGE]