<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UTC Marketing &#038; Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/</link>
	<description>UTC Alumni Affairs Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I hope the UTC staff who read the previous comments take note of the pattern. We are alumni of THE UNIVERSITY OF (tn at) CHATTANOOGA, NOT OF UT!!!!!!! Our college was founded in 1886 and for 2/3 of its history was The University of Chattanooga, a private liberal arts college. Its colors are blue and gold, not orange and white. UTC should change its name back to UC and be true to its roots, raising admission standards and emphasizing excellence in undergraduate education in the traditional liberal model. This would greatly boost alumni morale and increase support for the school. After all, if we had wanted to attend UT (and UT means UTK) we would have. Go Mocs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the UTC staff who read the previous comments take note of the pattern. We are alumni of THE UNIVERSITY OF (tn at) CHATTANOOGA, NOT OF UT!!!!!!! Our college was founded in 1886 and for 2/3 of its history was The University of Chattanooga, a private liberal arts college. Its colors are blue and gold, not orange and white. UTC should change its name back to UC and be true to its roots, raising admission standards and emphasizing excellence in undergraduate education in the traditional liberal model. This would greatly boost alumni morale and increase support for the school. After all, if we had wanted to attend UT (and UT means UTK) we would have. Go Mocs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Ditch the Orange. It has no place in Chattanooga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditch the Orange. It has no place in Chattanooga.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Rieman</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Rieman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I am a native born Memphian, and it wasn't until 2003 when my sister applied and began attending UTC that I even knew that it existed.  I followed behind her in 2005.  In the following years UTC has done a better job marketing itself and letting people outside of the Chattanooga area that we are here.  I know that there are recruiters that go to West, Middle, and East Tennessee, but are there any that are going into Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi schools that are just as close as some of the Tennessee ones?  I feel that we could do a better job at turning our attention to potential students in these areas.  

As for the branding, when I heard about it I was extrememly angry.  UTC is its own school, the "Linked but Distinct" slogan does not work for me.  We are the only school in the UT system that does not use orange as part of their colors.  The new billboards with "UT" in the words such as "FUTURE" with the teeny-tiny Chattanooga underneath do not do an adequate job of distinguishing Chattanooga from Knoxville.  The fact that we are considered The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga should be enough to link us in the UT system.  There are several alums that are still upset about this and still want us to go back to the University of Chattanooga.  Look at the University of Alabama in Birmingham and Huntsville.  They are part of the University of Alabama system, but they are completely distinct from the school in Tuscaloosa.  

We are unique and surrounded by so much history of the city and the changes that the University has gone through in the past.  We should try to market our distinctive qualities and spread our name around the Chattanooga area more, revive spirit throughout the community, and try to spread our name into the cities all around Tennessee.  We have downtown that is right there, great apartment style dorms (those are a big pull for us), many outdoor recreation opportunities, fabulous engineering and physical therapy schools, and a beautiful campus.  And we have so much more to offer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a native born Memphian, and it wasn&#8217;t until 2003 when my sister applied and began attending UTC that I even knew that it existed.  I followed behind her in 2005.  In the following years UTC has done a better job marketing itself and letting people outside of the Chattanooga area that we are here.  I know that there are recruiters that go to West, Middle, and East Tennessee, but are there any that are going into Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi schools that are just as close as some of the Tennessee ones?  I feel that we could do a better job at turning our attention to potential students in these areas.  </p>
<p>As for the branding, when I heard about it I was extrememly angry.  UTC is its own school, the &#8220;Linked but Distinct&#8221; slogan does not work for me.  We are the only school in the UT system that does not use orange as part of their colors.  The new billboards with &#8220;UT&#8221; in the words such as &#8220;FUTURE&#8221; with the teeny-tiny Chattanooga underneath do not do an adequate job of distinguishing Chattanooga from Knoxville.  The fact that we are considered The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga should be enough to link us in the UT system.  There are several alums that are still upset about this and still want us to go back to the University of Chattanooga.  Look at the University of Alabama in Birmingham and Huntsville.  They are part of the University of Alabama system, but they are completely distinct from the school in Tuscaloosa.  </p>
<p>We are unique and surrounded by so much history of the city and the changes that the University has gone through in the past.  We should try to market our distinctive qualities and spread our name around the Chattanooga area more, revive spirit throughout the community, and try to spread our name into the cities all around Tennessee.  We have downtown that is right there, great apartment style dorms (those are a big pull for us), many outdoor recreation opportunities, fabulous engineering and physical therapy schools, and a beautiful campus.  And we have so much more to offer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stennchat</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stennchat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I would like to have a UTC flag. I noticed the pennant in your mercandise, but I would love to fly the flag when I head to the beach this summer. Many SEC and ACC flags are flown, and I would like to do the same with ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to have a UTC flag. I noticed the pennant in your mercandise, but I would love to fly the flag when I head to the beach this summer. Many SEC and ACC flags are flown, and I would like to do the same with ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>One of the most frustrating things I see regarding the UT marketing campaign is that the system's research actually contradicts itself...when considering Chattanooga's campus. The research states that when most people think of the words "The University of Tennessee" they think of "organge sports" predominantly before they think of anything else. And with this knowledge, the system made a case to take the UTK/Vols orange and automatically use it to advertise for the entire system. Now that does NOT make sense when at the same time they are trying to illustrate the "distinctiveness" of each campus. The color orange just isn't the answer to helping adverstise the system as a linked system. Come on! UTK Vols orange just isn't, and never will be, a part of UTC's identity. 

Let's take the thought and apply it to business. You would NEVER see Old Navy stores call themselves "Old Navy of The Gap". No, Old Navy, although tied in with Gap and  Banana Republic, has a unique niche and purpose and market. And they advertise ONLY on their own distinctiveness, not the strengths of Gap or Banana Republic. Yet, most people still know that they are a part of the same parent company. It's no secret. And the individualized marketing and brand and colors work for the betterment of each individual company. And when Old Navy does its job for its customers, it builds loyalty to the store, and that loyalty carries its customers to the other company stores. When they get good quality service at Old Navy, they are more likely to also visit Gap and the Banana Republic. But again, Old Navy is it's own vital and unique store with its own image and marketing campaign and brand. 

The same should apply to UTC. Personally, I think, like the Old Navy example above, that to promote UTC's uniqueness, we should actually change the university name back to University of Chattanooga or Chattanooga University. Maybe still call it "Chattanooga University of the University of Tennessee System" in it's official title. But fall back on Chattanooga University (and "CU") as its main marketing title. And develop a unique marketing angle that calculates and showcases it's unique strengths...which in turn would promote the strength of the system. 

Your finger may not function as a heart. No, the heart is the main pump, but the finger has a unique purpose. And although it's not the main organ that keeps life going, it sure is important. The UT system (and even Knoxville) is the "mother ship" of the UT system, but it's only one of many unique campuses. Let them have the orange and the UT title. But give Chattanooga its own image and brand upon which to strengthen itself. Strengthen each individual institute and focus on each institute's strength, and it would be a sure bet that the system (and the mother ship) would benefit from it. 

Go Chattanooga University!!  And GO blue and gold MOCS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most frustrating things I see regarding the UT marketing campaign is that the system&#8217;s research actually contradicts itself&#8230;when considering Chattanooga&#8217;s campus. The research states that when most people think of the words &#8220;The University of Tennessee&#8221; they think of &#8220;organge sports&#8221; predominantly before they think of anything else. And with this knowledge, the system made a case to take the UTK/Vols orange and automatically use it to advertise for the entire system. Now that does NOT make sense when at the same time they are trying to illustrate the &#8220;distinctiveness&#8221; of each campus. The color orange just isn&#8217;t the answer to helping adverstise the system as a linked system. Come on! UTK Vols orange just isn&#8217;t, and never will be, a part of UTC&#8217;s identity. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the thought and apply it to business. You would NEVER see Old Navy stores call themselves &#8220;Old Navy of The Gap&#8221;. No, Old Navy, although tied in with Gap and  Banana Republic, has a unique niche and purpose and market. And they advertise ONLY on their own distinctiveness, not the strengths of Gap or Banana Republic. Yet, most people still know that they are a part of the same parent company. It&#8217;s no secret. And the individualized marketing and brand and colors work for the betterment of each individual company. And when Old Navy does its job for its customers, it builds loyalty to the store, and that loyalty carries its customers to the other company stores. When they get good quality service at Old Navy, they are more likely to also visit Gap and the Banana Republic. But again, Old Navy is it&#8217;s own vital and unique store with its own image and marketing campaign and brand. </p>
<p>The same should apply to UTC. Personally, I think, like the Old Navy example above, that to promote UTC&#8217;s uniqueness, we should actually change the university name back to University of Chattanooga or Chattanooga University. Maybe still call it &#8220;Chattanooga University of the University of Tennessee System&#8221; in it&#8217;s official title. But fall back on Chattanooga University (and &#8220;CU&#8221;) as its main marketing title. And develop a unique marketing angle that calculates and showcases it&#8217;s unique strengths&#8230;which in turn would promote the strength of the system. </p>
<p>Your finger may not function as a heart. No, the heart is the main pump, but the finger has a unique purpose. And although it&#8217;s not the main organ that keeps life going, it sure is important. The UT system (and even Knoxville) is the &#8220;mother ship&#8221; of the UT system, but it&#8217;s only one of many unique campuses. Let them have the orange and the UT title. But give Chattanooga its own image and brand upon which to strengthen itself. Strengthen each individual institute and focus on each institute&#8217;s strength, and it would be a sure bet that the system (and the mother ship) would benefit from it. </p>
<p>Go Chattanooga University!!  And GO blue and gold MOCS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utc.edu/Administration/Alumni/alumniblog/2007/03/13/utc-marketing-branding/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Chattanooga does not seem to market itself at all.  I have seen billboards across the state for Austin Peay, UTK, MTSU and Tennessee Tech, yet I have never seen one billboard for Chattanooga.  (Orange and White billboards with Chattanooga as a tiny footnote do NOT market this University.  It only promotes UTK.)  After donating to the Blue and Gold Club, I received as much orange and white mail as Blue and Gold mail.  This should not be tolerated.

I regret that I do not know enough about our uniqueness other than our Computational Engineering program, which has been hijacked by UTK's fUTure campaign, anyway.  As long as Chattanooga relies on the system to promote the campus and do the fundraising, this will continue to be viewed as a "branch campus."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chattanooga does not seem to market itself at all.  I have seen billboards across the state for Austin Peay, UTK, MTSU and Tennessee Tech, yet I have never seen one billboard for Chattanooga.  (Orange and White billboards with Chattanooga as a tiny footnote do NOT market this University.  It only promotes UTK.)  After donating to the Blue and Gold Club, I received as much orange and white mail as Blue and Gold mail.  This should not be tolerated.</p>
<p>I regret that I do not know enough about our uniqueness other than our Computational Engineering program, which has been hijacked by UTK&#8217;s fUTure campaign, anyway.  As long as Chattanooga relies on the system to promote the campus and do the fundraising, this will continue to be viewed as a &#8220;branch campus.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
